Assistant Professor of Finance at Utrecht University
Not Clearly Pro or Con to the question "Should Insider Trading by Congress Be Allowed?"
"Balancing the pros and cons of insider trading, one has to conclude...that there is very little harm caused by insider trading. First, one has to stress the social gains that come with informational efficient capital markets. The more prices reflect information accurately, the better prices guide capital investment in the economy. Moreover, it creates an additional signaling device for management to communicate complex news in a credible way. The confidence of investors is not expected to decline, empirical studies showed no decrease of market liquidity and the non-informed counterpart of the insider was not harmed, on the contrary. Another important social benefit from insider trading is the market-based compensation scheme, which makes it also possible to reward the innovative and entrepreneurial inputs of corporate insiders..."
Peter-Jan Engelen & Luc Van Leidekerke, "The Ethics of Insider Trading Revisited," Journal of Business Ethics, Sep. 2007
Experts Individuals with JDs, PhDs, or equivalent advanced degrees in fields relevant to insider trading issues. Also top-level government officials (such as foreign leaders, US presidents, Founding Fathers, Supreme Court Justices, members of legislative bodies, cabinet members, military leaders, etc.) with positions relevant to insider trading issues.
Involvement and Affiliations:
Assistant Professor, Finance, Utrecht University
Editor-in-Chief, Global Business & Economics Review
Former Lecturer, Corporate Finance, University of Antwerp
PhD, University of Antwerp
LLM, University of Antwerp
MSc, Applied Economics, Loyola University of Antwerp (UFSIA)