How do Congressional representatives' stocks perform in relation to the general market?
General Reference (not clearly pro or con)
Sources and Notes:
1. Brad M. Barber, MBA, PhD, and Terrance Odean, PhD, "Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors," The Journal of Finance, Apr. 2000. The study shows that the average household's stock portfolio earns an annual return of 16.4% on the stock market while the market's average return is 17.9%. ProCon.org used the difference between 16.4% and 17.9%, which is 1.5%, to indicate the average household's stock performance in relation to the market. We confirmed this calculation with Dr. Barber on Feb. 12, 2009.
2. Leslie A. Jeng, PhD, Andrew Metrick, PhD, and Richard Zeckhauser, PhD, "Estimating the Returns to Insider Trading: A Performance-Evaluation Perspective," The Review of Economics and Statistics, May 2003. The study showed that the stock purchases of corporate insiders perform higher than the market average by 52-68 basis points per month. The study did not find significant abnormal returns for corporate insiders' stock sales. The average of 52 and 68 basis points is 60 basis points, which equals an approximate 7.4% annual return.
3. Alan J. Ziobrowski, PhD, Ping Cheng, PhD, James W. Boyd, PhD, and Briggitte J. Ziobrowski, PhD, "Abnormal Returns from the Common Stock Investments of the U.S. Senate," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Dec. 2004. The study shows that Senators' stock sales and purchases combined outperform the market by 97 basis points per month, or 12.3% per year.
4. Alan J. Ziobrowski, PhD, James W. Boyd, PhD, Ping Cheng, PhD, and Briggitte J. Ziobrowski, PhD, "Abnormal Returns From the Common Stock Investments of Members of the US House of Representatives,"Business and Politics, May 2011. The study shows that members of the US House of Representatives' stock sales and purchases combined outperform the market by 55 basis points per month, or about 6% per year.
Alan J. Ziobrowski, PhD, Associate Professor in the Department of Real Estate at Georgia State University, et al., in their Dec. 2004 article "Abnormal Returns from the Common Stock Investments of the U.S. Senate," published in the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, wrote:
"[W]e find that members of the U.S. Senate outperformed the market by almost 100 basis points [One basis point is equivalent to 1/100th of a one percent. 100 basis points are equivalent to one percent.] per month...
When we equally weight the returns of each Senator, the buy portfolio earns a compound annual rate of 28.6% on an equal-weighted basis and 31.1% on a trade-weighted basis compared to 21.3% for the market...
Cumulative abnormal returns for the portfolio of stocks bought by Senators are near zero for the calendar year prior to the date of purchase. After acquisition, the cumulative abnormal return rises over 25% within one calendar year after the purchase date. The cumulative abnormal returns for the portfolio of stocks sold by the Senators are near zero for the calendar year after the date of sale. However, these same stocks saw a cumulative abnormal positive return of 25% during the year immediately preceding the event date. These results suggest that Senators knew the appropriate times to both buy and sell their common stocks...
After being sold by Senators, stocks underperform the market by 12 basis points per month on a trade-weighted basis....Combining the buy transactions with the sell transactions in a hedged portfolio we find that Senators outperform the market by 97 basis points (nearly 1%) per month on a trade-weighted basis...
We find no reliable differences between the returns earned by Democrats and Republicans but seniority appears to be important. Senators with the least seniority (in their first Senatorial term) earn statistically higher returns than those Senators with the longest seniority (over 16 years in the Senate)."
Thomas Ferguson, PhD, Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, was quoted in the Jan. 1, 2006 Washington Spectator article "An Ethics Quagmire: Senators Beat the Stock Market--and Get Rich--with Insider Information" by Max Holland, as having stated:
"Nobody gets results like [those of US Senators] in the financial world consistently and over the long term, any manager of a mutual fund...who regularly beats the market by as little as two percent annually is considered an investment genius."